Ruiz F, et al. Contact sensitization to allergens inside the Spanish Standard Series at Hospital Costa del Sol in Marbella, Spain: a retrospective study (2005-2010). Actas Dermosifiliogr 2012; 103: 223-38. 11. Rudzki E. Alterations inside the pattern of sensitization [Polish]. Alergia Astma Immunologia Kliniczna 2005; two: 53-7. 12. Nguyen SH, Dang TP, MacPherson C, et al. Prevalence of patch test results from 1970 to 2002 in a multi-centre population in North America (NACDG). Get in touch with Dermatitis 2008; 58: 101-6. 13. Lachapelle JM, Maibach HI. Patch testing. Prick testing. Springer, Berlin 2003; 27-69. 14. Bruynzeel DP, Diepgen TL, Andersen KE, et al. Monitoring the European typical series in 10 centres 1996-2000. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 53: 146-52. 15. Kie-wierczyska M, Krcisz B, Chomiczewska D, et al. Trends In allergy for the ten most frequent contact allergens in individuals examined at Nofer Institute, Lodz, Poland in 1996-2009. Postep Derm Alergol 2012; 29: 19-24. 16. Malolepszy J. Wystpowanie chor alergicznych w Polsce. [Polish]. Alergia Astma Immunologia 2000; S2: 163-9. 17. Jensen CS, Lisby S, Baadsgaard O, et al. Reduce in nickel sensitization in a Danish schoolgirl population with ears pierced immediately after implementation of a nickel-exposure regulation. Br J Dermatol 2002; 146: 636-42. 18. Schnuch A, Uter W. Reduce in nickel allergy in Germany and regulatory interventions. Get in touch with Dermatitis 2003; 49: 107-8. 19. Lindberg M, Edman B, Fischer T, Stenberg B. Time trends in Swedish patch test information from 1992 to 2000. A multicentre study according to age- and sex-adjusted results on the Swedish normal series. Make contact with Dermatitis 2007; 56: 205-10. 20. Liden C, Norberg K. Nickel on the Swedish industry. Follow-up soon after implementation from the Nickel Directive. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 52: 29-35.Postpy Dermatologii i Alergologii 6, December /Patch test final results in patients with allergic speak to dermatitis within the Podlasie region21. Limaska M, mudziska M, Jenerowicz D, et al. The value of exposure to make contact with allergens in individuals with allergic get in touch with dermatitis. Post Dermatol Alergol 2011; 28: 203-11. 22. Menne T, Rasmussen K. Regulation of nickel exposure in Denmark. Make contact with Dermatitis 1990; 23: 57-8. 23. European Parliament and Council Directive 94/27/EC of 30 June 1994 amending for the 12th time Directive 76/769/EEC around the approximation on the laws, regulations and administrative provisions in the Member States relating to restrictions on the promoting and use of specific harmful substances and preparations. Official Journal L 1994; 188: 1-2.Varenicline 24.Prazosin hydrochloride Reduta T, Laudaska H, Chodynicka B.PMID:23937941 Contact hypersensitivity in sufferers of your Division of Dermatology and Venereology through the final 5 years [Polish]. Przegl Dermatol 2002; three: 193-7. 25. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF, Warshaw EM, et al. Detection of nickel sensitivity has enhanced in north American patch-test patients. Dermatitis 2008; 19: 16-9. 26. Teh-Yang C, Yu-Hsian T, Chee-Ching S, Chia-Yu C. Speak to sensitization to metals in Taiwan. Speak to Dermatitis 2008; 59: 353-60. 27. Lunder T, Kansky A. Enhance in get in touch with allergy to fragrances: patch-test benefits 1989-1998. Make contact with Dermatitis 2000; 43: 107-9. 28. Kohl L, Blondeel A, Song M. Allergic make contact with dermatitis from cosmetics. Retrospective analysis of 819 patch-tested sufferers. Dermatology 2002; 204: 334-7. 29. Rudzki E, Rebandel P, Parapura K. Allergens of stasis dermatitis [Polish]. Przegl Dermatol 2004; 91: 107-30. 30. Tyssen JP, Hald M, Avnstorp C, e.
Posted inUncategorized